Accounting-to-model reconciliation
Build a bridge from historic ledger and management reporting to the transaction model, with differences and judgement areas recorded.
Expertise
Prepare the model, evidence and management narrative for fundraising, financing or M&A, and coordinate the work needed to become diligence-ready.
Build a bridge from historic ledger and management reporting to the transaction model, with differences and judgement areas recorded.
Connect commercial, operating, financing and cash assumptions in a model that can be sensitised and updated as the process develops.
Separate reported growth into contract status, recurring behaviour, customer and product mix, accounting presentation, concentration and other drivers relevant to the business model.
Define and reconcile opportunity, awarded, contracted, delivered, invoiced and collected stages instead of presenting them as one commercial measure.
Explain the bridge from earnings to cash through collection, payment, inventory, contract assets, deferred revenue, restricted funds and transaction-specific adjustments where relevant.
Model the amount, timing, use, runway, repayment or dilution implications of funding options without implying that financing is guaranteed.
Historic financials, operating drivers, forecast statements, cash, financing, sensitivities and a transparent assumptions register in one working model.
A documented connection from ledger or approved management figures to the opening model period and each material normalisation.
Revenue by customer, product, contract status and other relevant dimensions, with concentration, retention or presentation analysis supported by available evidence.
Definitions, stage gates, source evidence, movements, cancellation terms where available, and reconciliation to recognised or forecast revenue.
A view of collections, supplier timing, inventory, contract balances, restricted cash and other drivers that explain cash conversion.
A structured document list with owner, source, reporting period, status, version, confidentiality level and open gap.
A readiness diagnostic runs for 1 to 3 weeks. A focused model, revenue-quality or data-room sprint runs for 4 to 8 weeks. A wider transaction-readiness programme can run for 3 to 9 months; embedded support can continue on a monthly rolling basis through an active process. Timelines depend on evidence access and counterparty dates.
One senior adviser is accountable for the financial workstream. Modelling, finance and transaction-process capacity is assigned to the agreed outputs. The client retains its legal, tax, audit, regulatory and corporate-finance advisers; responsibilities and information routes are recorded at kick-off.
The client appoints an executive transaction owner and a finance lead, provides controlled access to financial, contract and commercial evidence, brings the relevant managers to issue reviews, and confirms or escalates factual and judgement questions within the transaction timetable.
Reconcile the first historic period, inspect the existing model and data room, define transaction questions and separate missing evidence from unresolved accounting or commercial judgements.
Agree the model structure, revenue and cash analyses, evidence index, review responsibilities, version control and response process.
Complete the model, bridges, revenue analysis, data-room index and Q&A materials; test consistency across documents and log every open item.
Hand over working files, source links, assumptions, trackers and owner maps; where the process continues, move to a defined update and response cadence.
U.Avero works with C-level teams to turn critical decisions into operating practice. We combine senior advisory with hands-on implementation, process automation and clearly scoped BPO. Depending on the need, we transfer a working process to the client team or continue to run the agreed scope with clear ownership and controls.
Frequently asked questions
It can support any of those situations when the need is a defensible financial case and controlled evidence process. The model, analyses and data-room structure are set around the specific counterparty questions. Securities placement, regulated investment advice, legal execution or a buyer search are not implied and must be separately defined with the appropriate advisers.
Start before external questions set the timetable. The first diagnostic should happen while management can still reconcile historic reporting, resolve model definitions, collect contract evidence and assign data-room owners. If a process is already active, the scope prioritises the questions that could delay or undermine it.
The difference is made visible and traced. The work creates a documented bridge, identifies data errors and policy or scope differences, and assigns each unresolved judgement to the proper owner. It does not conceal the gap with a plug or relabel an unapproved adjustment as audited information.
The engagement can build operating forecasts, scenario cases and valuation inputs or sensitivities for management discussion. Any formal valuation opinion, fairness conclusion or regulated advice requires a separately qualified provider and an agreed basis. No transaction value or financing outcome is promised.
Three commitment levels
Next step
We can start with C-level advisory, implementation, automation or a defined BPO process. We normally aim to reply within one business day. Sensitive detail can wait until an NDA is signed.